Advisory and audits

Know what to automate before you start

An audit describes a process as it runs today, not as the written procedure says it should. We measure the effort each step takes, check the state of the data, and separate the processes worth automating from those where the cost would exceed the saving.

Free consultation

The audit is commissioned as a separate service. A follow-on project is not a condition of carrying it out.

Two people mapping a process on a board during an audit
  • 01

    The real course

    We record who performs each step, in which tool, and what they do when an exception comes up.

  • 02

    A recommendation with limits

    We identify the processes worth automating, and those we would leave as they are.

  • 03

    The document is yours

    The report stays with your company whatever you decide about working together further.

01Scope

What we examine

We start with one area where the manual work is visible and can be counted. Tools are chosen later.

  • Process

    A map of how the work really runs

    We talk to the people who perform each step and record the route a case actually takes.

  • Time

    The effort each step takes

    We measure how long a step takes and how many cases pass through it in a typical month.

  • Cost

    The work required after launch

    We estimate the upkeep: rule changes, exception handling and oversight of results. That figure decides whether a solution pays off as often as the cost of building it does.

  • Data

    Readiness of the data

    We check whether the information is complete, held in one format and available without manual retyping.

  • Selection

    What is and is not worth automating

    Steps with repeatable rules go into the recommendation. The rest are described together with the reason for setting them aside.

  • Policy

    A policy for using AI

    We set out which data staff may put into AI tools, which tools they may use, and who approves new uses.

02Mechanism

What drives the recommendation

Every process is judged against the same four criteria, so the conclusions can be compared across areas.

  1. 01

    Number of cases

    A step performed a few times a month rarely repays the cost of building. We count the repetitions in a typical month and set them against the effort involved.

  2. 02

    Stability of the rules

    A decision that can be described by conditions is a candidate for automation. A judgement that needs context and accountability stays with a person.

  3. 03

    State of the data

    We check where the information comes from, how often it is updated, and how many fields have to be filled in by hand before it can be used.

  4. 04

    Cost of upkeep

    Every recommendation carries an estimate of the work after launch. A solution that needs constant oversight is judged differently from one that runs unchanged.

03Division

Scope of the work

The scope depends on the number of processes, the availability of the people who do the work, and the state of the existing documentation.

On our side

  • a map of the process together with its exceptions
  • measurement of the effort and the number of cases
  • assessment of the data and the source systems
  • a recommendation with an estimated cost of upkeep
  • a final document handed over to your company

What we need from you

  • conversations with the people who carry out the process
  • sample documents and data from the process
  • information about the tools used in the work today
  • a decision-maker who will receive the conclusions
04Stages

From conversation to document

  1. Stage 1

    Choosing the area

    We agree which process is being examined and who knows it from the doing side.

  2. Stage 2

    Recording the course

    We talk to the team and describe each step, along with the exceptions and the corrections.

  3. Stage 3

    Measurement and data review

    We measure the effort involved, check the sources of the information and how complete the fields are.

  4. Stage 4

    Document and debrief

    We hand over the report with its recommendation and go through it with the people responsible for the process.

05Questions

Common questions

Answers on commitments, on the outcome of the audit, on data and on the policy for using AI.

No. The document with the process map, the measurements and the recommendation stays with your company. You can act on it yourselves, come back to it later, or give the work to another supplier.

Contact

Discuss the audit scope

In the first conversation you describe the process that takes the most time and the people who carry it out. Afterwards we set out the scope of the audit and the material needed to run it.

  1. 01

    Area

    You point to the process that absorbs the most manual work, or the one that most often needs correcting.

  2. 02

    People and data

    We establish who knows the course from the doing side and which data can be made available to us.

  3. 03

    Audit scope

    We set out what the assessment will cover and which document you receive at the end.

Leave your contact details

You can also write to: kontakt@futurefirst.pl